"The point is not that white activists, in order to be anti-racist, need to uncritically support any Asian, Latin@, indigenous, or black resistance group that pops up. However, there is a Eurocentric universalism in the idea that we are all part of the same homogeneous struggle and white people at the heart of the Empire can ell people of color and people in the (neo)colonies the best way to resist. The people most affected by a system of oppression should be that he forefront of the struggle against that particular oppression, yet pacifism again and again produces organizations and movements of white people illuminating the path and leading the way to save brown people, because the imperative of nonviolence overrides the basic respect of trusting people to liberate themselves. Whenever white pacifists concern themselves with a cause that affects people of color, and resisters among the affected people of color do not conform to the particular definition of nonviolence in use, the white activists place themselves as the teachers and guides, creating a dynamic that is remarkably colonial. Of coarse, this is largely a function of whiteness (a socially constructed worldview taught diffusively to all people identified by society as “white”). Militant white activists can and do incur similar problems when they disrespect allies of color by dictating the appropriate, orthodox method of struggle."

Peter Gelderloos, Why Nonviolence Protects the State - Nonviolence is Racist
@6 months ago with 275 notes
#why nonviolence protects the state #pacifisim #militancy #militant revolution #privilege #violence #nonviolence 

"Nonviolence declares that the American Indians could have fought off Columbus, George Washington, and all the other genocidal butchers with sit-ins; that Crazy Horse, by using violent resistance, became part of the cycle of violence, and as “as bad as” Custer. Nonviolence declares that Africans could have stopped the slave trade with hunger strikes and petitions, and that those who mutinied were as bad as their captors; that mutiny, a form of violence, led to more violence, and thus, resistance led to more enslavement. Nonviolence refuses to recognize that it can only work for privileged people, who have a status protected by violence, as the perpetrators and beneficiaries of a violent hierarchy."

Peter Gelderloos, Why Nonviolence Protects the State- Nonviolence is Racist
@6 months ago with 1772 notes
#racism #why nonviolence protects the state #nonviolence is racist #militant #pacifism #nonviolence 
"The point is not that white activists, in order to be anti-racist, need to uncritically support any Asian, Latin@, indigenous, or black resistance group that pops up. However, there is a Eurocentric universalism in the idea that we are all part of the same homogeneous struggle and white people at the heart of the Empire can ell people of color and people in the (neo)colonies the best way to resist. The people most affected by a system of oppression should be that he forefront of the struggle against that particular oppression, yet pacifism again and again produces organizations and movements of white people illuminating the path and leading the way to save brown people, because the imperative of nonviolence overrides the basic respect of trusting people to liberate themselves. Whenever white pacifists concern themselves with a cause that affects people of color, and resisters among the affected people of color do not conform to the particular definition of nonviolence in use, the white activists place themselves as the teachers and guides, creating a dynamic that is remarkably colonial. Of coarse, this is largely a function of whiteness (a socially constructed worldview taught diffusively to all people identified by society as “white”). Militant white activists can and do incur similar problems when they disrespect allies of color by dictating the appropriate, orthodox method of struggle."
Peter Gelderloos, Why Nonviolence Protects the State - Nonviolence is Racist
6 months ago
#why nonviolence protects the state #pacifisim #militancy #militant revolution #privilege #violence #nonviolence 
"Nonviolence declares that the American Indians could have fought off Columbus, George Washington, and all the other genocidal butchers with sit-ins; that Crazy Horse, by using violent resistance, became part of the cycle of violence, and as “as bad as” Custer. Nonviolence declares that Africans could have stopped the slave trade with hunger strikes and petitions, and that those who mutinied were as bad as their captors; that mutiny, a form of violence, led to more violence, and thus, resistance led to more enslavement. Nonviolence refuses to recognize that it can only work for privileged people, who have a status protected by violence, as the perpetrators and beneficiaries of a violent hierarchy."
Peter Gelderloos, Why Nonviolence Protects the State- Nonviolence is Racist
6 months ago
#racism #why nonviolence protects the state #nonviolence is racist #militant #pacifism #nonviolence